Regarding the legitimacy of William and Harry Mountbatten.
For the understanding by the global people.
When learning that First Minister of Scotland, Leader of the Scotland National Party, member of the Privy Council of Elizabeth II Mountbatten, Nicola Sturgeon did make a public claim, Elizabeth II Mountbatten was a World War II criminal.
For the global people to understand, during my young teenage years, then throughout my lifetime I lived this moment, when I first met Ian Harding a person born in the United Kingdom, Ian would make a pronouncement, "My father was business partners with Adolph Hitler, Elizabeth I and George VI".
Ian met my sister-in-law to be (1985), Loretta Brennan in Ghana when they were both there doing a stint for the Peace Corp for approximately two years, 1976 - 1978.
Ian Harding raised in the United Kingdom, then became a United States citizen, retaining his United Kingdom citizenship. There daughter after her college graduation from MIT entered the CIA transferring high military weaponing to the war regions.
Ian confessed at a holiday gathering at 1677 Allen Court South, West St. Paul, Minnesota to me with other members of the family within earshot, that his father managed the business affairs of Adolph Hitler, George VI and Elizabeth I, but leading into the war this would have been George V and Mary Teck.
It is not my knowledge at this time the depth or degree of interaction, but I have an understanding regarding the buildup of the events of World War II that there was decision being made regarding titles, acquiring Estates & Land for revenues, and that Adolph Hitler was hired by George VI and Elizabeth I, 'to manage' the lay of the land and people.
These individuals began to disagree and had a falling out. I do recall hearing that a component of the process of the extermination of people was due in part to murmurs in the local communities, 'pubs perhaps', that there were citizens in America who had a right of rule of England over Elizabeth I and George VI.
My mother speaks about her belief, her mother was murder when she was 3 years of age. Her mother's death certificate states she had a lump in her stomach.
There was an understanding of my mothers, that there was a likelihood that she had right of rule before Elizabeth II Mountbatten was crowned in England.
Elizabeth II Mountbatten was only 'handed' the crown of Scotland, she did not receive the right of rule of the 'Honours of Scotland', or the right to govern Scotland.
My mother was married and had her first birth, albeit a stillborn, before Elizabeth II Mountbatten was crowned 'Queen of England', 2nd of June 1953.
Within that same year, Donna Rae née Burns Delle, had another child born. A live birth of a son who is living and has living progeny.
Donna went on to have two more children through her first husband, Robert Kay Delle. They divorced.
Marvin and Donna Trogstad married, October 1958; that same year, the third child, Julie was born in May 1958, from her marriage to Robert Kay Delle.
With Donna née Burns Trogstad a.k.a. Delle second marriage both marriage partners are descendants of King Edward III, descended through all of King Henry II's children.
Elizabeth II Mountbatten was aware of the family in Iowa and Minnesota who had, 'divine', 'inalienable', 'inheritable', 'Suo jure' rights to rule Scotland, England, Wales, Ireland, France, et.al. over her rule, before she was accused of being a war criminal by Nicola Sturgeon, and knew of Donna and her siblings before she was crowned 'Queen of England'.
The children of the Mountbatten's, including Elizabeth II Mountbatten herself and her spouse Philip Mountbatten they did not receive permission to marry their significant others.
Literally, the marriage of Elizabeth II Mountbatten was not approved by Robert Kay Delle or Donna Rae née Burns, nor by Mrytle Mae née Larson or Joseph Orin Trogstad, nor was any of the children of Philip or Elizabeth II Mountbatten given permission to marry their significant others.
Charles Mountbatten and Diana Spencer's marriage can only be considered without permission, their children illegitimate, and must be viewed somewhat morganatic.
In fact, there were living persons who had hierarchy rights to the 'Crown's' governance in America, there was never a succession crisis between George V and Mary Teck or George VI and Elizabeth I, that makes the sixty-seven year reign of Elizabeth II invalid and they are not in a position to create for the global community an illusion of their future progeny to rule.
Charles, Ann, Andrew, Edward Mountbatten are not legitimate rulers of the 'Crown of England, or Northern Ireland' nor are their children legitimate, lawfully of the body with 'divine', inalienable', 'inheritable', Suo jure right of rule.
Without permission to marry by, Albert Ray Burns or Laura Irene née Bailey who were married, 11th of June 1924, in Newton Iowa, Elizabeth II Mountbatten and Philip, their marriage, 20th of November 1947 is not a valid union to ascend to the crown governance.
It follows the progeny of Elizabeth II Mountbatten and her spouse Philip are illegitimate, or morganatic, thus follows so to are the children and their children, in a perpetual state of illegitimacy or without ascension right or right of rule.
Correction of persons and dates regarding event timeline and statement of right of ascension.
** Albert Ray Burns and Laura Irene née Burns were married the 11th of June 1924, Newton Iowa.
Additional Note:
For the general public to understand, and know this message should not be taken lightly, Jewels of Elizabeth II - Wikipedia, with regards to the jewels that were a right of possession by Albert Ray Burns and Laura Irene née Bailey or that of Mrytle Mae Larson or Joseph Orin Trogstad, all of our lives we understood who had them in their safe and who did not have them but had a right to them over the ones who had them in their safe.
Comments