In 1028, the 'House of Zähringen', held the title of 'Duke of Swabia'.
The House of Zähringen, an ancestral house of King Carl XVI Gustaf, of Sweden as a descendant through his Great Grandmother Victoria, of Baden, her grandson, Prince Gustaf Adolf, 'Duke of Västerbotten, father of Carl XVI, conceded the title of 'Duke of Swabia' to the 'House of Hohenstaufen'.
Built by Frederick I, in 1070, before becoming 'Duke of Swabia', the royal family called and did reside at Hohenstaufen Castle, Goppingen, Germany.
Peasant War results in the demise of the Hohenstaufen castle and is now a monument.
Hohenstaufen founded in 1079, country's described in Wikipedia are:
Duchy of Swabia
Holy Roman Empire
Kingdom of Sicily
Kingdom of Jerusalem
Titles of the Hohenstaufen:
Duke of Swabia
King of Italy
Holy Roman Emperor
King of Jerusalem
King of the Romans
King of Burgundy
Count of Burgundy
The Duchy of Zähringen, not recognized as part of the original 'Stem Duchies', (Franks, Saxons, Bavarians, Swabians) rather considered a constituent duchy of the German Empire, attempted expansion along the 'Black Forest' and western Swiss Plateau, of the 'Duchy of Zähringen' though this was halted in 1130, due feuds with the Welfs.
Though there was gains of cities and monasteries, after the extinction of the ducal line in 1218, parts of the family's territories, per wikipedia, reverted to the crown, attained 'imperial immediacy', other parts went to 'House of Kyburg', 'House of Urach', 'House of Fürstenberg'.
Fast forward...
The House of Fürstenberg, ruler, 'King Michael I', his coronation, 6 September 1940, of Romania was forced to abdicate, the 30th of December 1947. He ruled under the 'Royal' House of Romania, also the Romanian line 'Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen', under the parent of 'House of Hohenzollern'
Michael I was claimant of the rule of the House of Romania and Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen which was from 2011 then abolished in 10 May 2011. His daughter Margareta, of Romania is custodial of the Crown of Romania.
Speaking of pieces of pies, or a fact of inalienable inheritable Suo jure lawfully of the body right to make claims to Titles, Estates, Land, Revenues, at the heart of almost every civil war, or the beginnings of the two world wars, I have considered the moves made in 2008 in the Virginia Tidewater region, by Elizabeth II Mountbatten and former U.S. President Barack Obama where they did generate legislation through the Federal Bureau of Indian Affairs to removed particular lines of descendants from hierarchical claims within the Pamunkey Tribe and the original colonist of the Jamestown Colony or through the descendants of Lawrence Washington of Westmoreland County, Virginia and of England.
These descendant's have a right to know for many reasons, yet simply to know their progressive lineage through history.
With the United States governing President, Joe Biden, making statements there is a possibility of a 3rd World War, I have taken the stance to publicly denounce those who attempted to remove the above rights from the family members of Plum Tree Memory Family, progeny of the Seths, Trogstads and Burns family.
As a descendant of King Henry II, of England, through all of his children, a descendant of the 'House of Welf', the 'House of Houhensaufen', also the 'House of Hohenzolleren' I pursued navigating the actual line of descent that was being overlooked intentionally through Wikipedia.
I had to, for their safety and the public's safety, of my own actions and deducing of facts put forth in public, to publicly recognize the rights of hierarchical claim to Crown Governance the family members of Plum Tree Memory Family have.
Our family did not receive, short of social services in some non-enduring instances, ever, 'revenues' that generated power or wealth, or political body of supporters. Only did they receive social services that would allow for sustainable living conditions that abides by the laws of the particular cities, counties, and states we resided in.
Knowing that the governing bodies over the years were aware of rights of affluence to attain certain Titles, Estates, Lands, and Revenues, then did access those goods and services for their own benefits, suggesting of our ignorance of our rights, so this was done on our behalf is treasonous as we acted within the laws of the American body of governess by the people though we were told as children of our possible rights to the Crowns by our parents and their social peers.
Clearly there has been a high rate of extortion over a time period of more than eighty to one hundred years, so describable this is disclosable and discussable within society in all venues and on all platforms.
Comments