I have assumed the position and title of Duke of Lancaster preferring, 'Duchess of Lancaster' this title that Elizabeth II Mountbatten did hold at the time of her death.
I am learning in a short amount of time, and greatly late in the game, that I and my family members have suo jure inalienable inheritable rights to titles and land holdings, i.e. Duchy's, Kingdom's, etc. that provide us a place in history so profound that it is making my headspin.
I wonder recently, having asserted myself into the House of Lords in many different ways, just what might Lady Diana Spencer herself understood about her own ex-husband's limitations, her son's lessening of place and what she was up against with Elizabeth I and Elizabeth II and the members of the United Kingdom within Parliament.
I have learned that even the United States governing body of legislators and Congress persons have had their hand at the fun of deception towards the family members of Plum Tree Memory and have chosen to fawn over Charles Mountbatten and his mother for more years than they should have been induldged.
This has allowed placement for person to access estates, crown jewels, revenues and titles that they just should not have been allowed to be near.
Troublesome to me is that I watch activist throwing food products against art objects and they make the claim that 'someone' in society is more interested in art than the welfare of the people and their need for food and climate change.
I must scoff at these individuals who are intentionally limiting my progress towards control and influence of what is rightfully mine while they give off-handed comments and drama pretense of my lack of concern. The two have nothing to do with one another, the protection of art objects from them now is my immediate concern where as before I was concerned about the misdirection or removal of art and artifacts from museum where Camilla or Charles Mountbatten would attempt to possess items that rightfully belonged to my family. This has nothing to do with the need for food or climate change.
Instead, I must consider the actual nature of these activist putting themselves in such an embarrassing state and ask the public to reason out why it appears they are almost positioning themselves in association to Philip Brennan, my former brother-in-law, and his wife Eileen Campbell Brennan, both who have sought control of land, estates, revenue through my children who have a Jacobite claim to the crown, over Eileen's family members presumed right to their family land; however, suo jure, inalienable inheritable rights out right are my families and the U.K. parliament was changing this through legislative acts in the 1990's. Eileen and Philip along with my other former sister-in-law and brother-in-law did know of our rights and kept these details from my family.
It appears the Campbell land in Scotland is at issue for Eileen and Philip, and I know for many years these four individuals have been putting the word out, sending out messages globally strutting their prowess.
These individuals who are using mashed potatoes or Campbell/Heinz products in their actions seem to align themselves with Eileen and Philip.
What did the late, though I consider possibly illegally detained with life internment similar as was attempted to be done to my person also in 2013, Lady Diana Spencer know. Was Eileen Campbell Brennan, my former sister-in-law challenging Diana?
Comments